25+
Years of technology experience
Why TechEffective
Better Technology Decisions Start With Independent Advice
Technology decisions are rarely just about technology.
They involve people, workflows, budgets, vendors, risk, organizational capacity, competing priorities, and what happens after the project is over.
TechEffective exists to help nonprofits navigate that whole picture.
Independent means independent
Advice should start with what actually makes sense for your organization.
I don’t resell software, receive commissions for recommendations, or need to steer your organization toward a preferred vendor or platform.
Sometimes the answer is a new system. Sometimes it is fixing the process, improving the system you already own, using your existing provider differently, delaying a purchase, or doing nothing at all.
I’ve sat on both sides of the table
I know what good consulting looks like after the consultant leaves.
I’ve worked as the external consultant and implementer responsible for understanding a client’s needs and delivering something useful. I’ve also been the internal IT Director responsible for budgets, systems, vendors, staff, projects, security, leadership expectations, and what happens next.
That experience shapes how I scope work, communicate, document decisions, collaborate with other providers, and think about long-term ownership.
14+
Years in nonprofit technology
28
US and International locations supported for Rise Against Hunger
80+
UNC School of Medicine departments and institutes
Rise Against Hunger
Building technology capacity during rapid organizational growth
Building and leading an internal IT function taught me to consider not just what technology can accomplish, but what an organization can realistically own, support, and sustain.
UNC School of Medicine
Leading enterprise applications, web, and data in a complex environment
Working across a complex organization reinforced how important coordination, clear ownership, and collaboration are to successful technology initiatives.
Before moving into internal IT leadership, I also worked as a nonprofit technology consultant with legal services, advocacy, and other mission-driven organizations. Today, TechEffective brings those perspectives back together.
When you hire TechEffective, you get me
The experience you are hiring is the experience doing the work.
Many consulting firms legitimately bring deep organizational experience. But the person with decades of experience is not always the person doing most of your work.
With TechEffective, I am the person you talk with, the person doing the analysis, and, where appropriate, the person working directly in the systems.
Senior thinking without distance from the work
Technology leadership should not require losing touch with how technology actually works.
My center of gravity is IT Director-level work: connecting leadership priorities to systems, projects, operations, vendors, budgets, data, security, and staff reality.
But I am also comfortable going deeper. My background includes software development, databases and data migration, systems integration, enterprise architecture, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, Salesforce, WordPress, web systems, reporting, security, and custom solution design.
Lead
Provide direction, ownership, prioritization, and accountability.
Support
Help your team make stronger decisions and move complex work forward.
Do
Get into the systems and complete technical work directly when that is the most effective path.
Leadership + Strategy + Operations + Technology
The visible technology problem is not always the real problem.
Many nonprofit technology problems live at the intersections between systems, people, process, ownership, and organizational decisions. I look across those boundaries rather than assuming the symptom defines the solution.
A reporting problem
may really be a data ownership problem.
A software problem
may really be a workflow problem.
A vendor problem
may really be a governance problem.
A security problem
may involve technology, policy, staffing, and behavior together.
Right-sized, not overbuilt
More technology is not automatically better technology.
Neither is more process, more governance, more documentation, or a larger project. The goal is enough structure to make good decisions and create sustainable operations without building something the organization cannot realistically support.
That means considering
- Staff capacity
- Budget and total cost
- Organizational maturity
- Risk and complexity
- Long-term ownership
- Cognitive load and support requirements
- What actually matters to the mission
I play well with others
You do not have to replace your existing technology partners to work with me.
I can lead the whole picture or contribute one piece. I can help coordinate partners, translate between leadership and technical teams, fill a temporary gap, or help move an organization from one operating model to another.
Sometimes success means eventually handing my work to an internal employee, MSP, specialist, or another consultant. That is a good outcome.
Internal IT staff
MSPs and help desk providers
Salesforce partners
Web developers
Security specialists
Software vendors
Data and analytics teams
Other consultants
Professional foundation
Technical depth, leadership development, and organizational change.
My approach combines a computer science foundation with technology leadership, consulting, organizational change, and experience working directly with nonprofit teams.
View my education and certificationsStart small
Working together does not need to begin with a large engagement.
A focused conversation or working session can help clarify the problem, pressure-test a decision, or determine whether additional work even makes sense. You should come away with something useful even if we never work together again.
No obligation. No sales pitch. Just clarity.